Case 1803744/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Bailey v Latus Health Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1803744/2021
- Decision date
- 28 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Ms J Rathbone, Mr R Webb
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Bailey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs N Bailey brought claims against Latus Health Limited for breach of contract, unfair dismissal, sex discrimination, age discrimination, disability discrimination, disability-related harassment, and accrued but unpaid holiday entitlement on termination of employment. The tribunal recorded that the breach of contract claim succeeded on the respondent's admission, and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £3,333.34.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's remaining complaints of unfair dismissal, sex discrimination, age discrimination, disability discrimination, disability-related harassment, and accrued but unpaid holiday entitlement. No separate remedy was awarded for the dismissed claims, and the judgment does not record any split of the £3,333.34 award between heads of loss or any additional interest or compensation.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim succeeded on the respondent's admission; the tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £3,333.34. | Upheld | — | £3,333 |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Described in the judgment as disability-related harassment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to a claim for accrued but unpaid holiday entitlement on termination of employment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,333
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.