Case 1804181/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M A Jamil v Davies Group Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1804181/2021
- Decision date
- 25 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moxon Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M A Jamil
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Mr M A Jamil's complaint of unfair dismissal against Davies Group Ltd at Leeds on 23 to 25 February 2022. Employment Judge Moxon found that the claimant had been constructively dismissed by the respondent and that the dismissal was unfair. No other claims are identified in the judgment.
On remedy, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £1,001.22. It recorded that the claimant had suffered no financial losses consequent upon the dismissal, so the compensatory award was limited to £327.10 for loss of statutory rights (£297.40) and expenses accrued travelling to a job interview (£29.70). The total award payable was £1,328.32.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal determined the claimant was constructively dismissed and that the dismissal was unfair. The judgment did not separate the award between different claims because there was only an unfair dismissal complaint. | Upheld | — | £1,328 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,328
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,001
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £327
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.