Case 1804183/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Asante v NIC Services Group Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1804183/2019
- Decision date
- 12 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Asante
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment dealt with a strike out issue concerning the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint. The tribunal recorded that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires not less than two years' service for an unfair dismissal complaint.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been employed by the respondent for less than two years. It also recorded that the claimant had not given an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity, why the complaint should not be struck out.
The unfair dismissal complaint was struck out. The claimant's unlawful deductions from wages complaint was expressly unaffected by the judgment and was to continue to a hearing on 2 December 2019.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal complaint was struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service and had not given an acceptable reason why it should not be struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unlawful deductions from wages complaint was not determined in this judgment and was stated to continue to a hearing on 2 December 2019. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.