Case 1804359/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Finlay v Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804359/2019
- Decision date
- 30 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Finlay
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a full hearing in Leeds before Employment Judge Deeley on 27 to 30 January 2020, the tribunal decided two claims brought by Mr G Finlay against Tees, Esk & Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust. The tribunal held that the claim for ordinary unfair dismissal under s.94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 failed and was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the Claimant’s claim for ordinary unfair dismissal under s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996 failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the Claimant’s claim for wrongful dismissal, treated as a breach of contract claim under s.3 of the Employment Tribunals Act and the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994, failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.3 Employment Tribunals Act
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.