Case 1804407/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Payne v Regal Fish Supplies Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1804407/2021
- Decision date
- 11 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr M Elwen, Mr P Kent
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Payne
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn case 1804407/2021, Ms J Payne's claims against Regal Fish Supplies Ltd were heard at Leeds on 9 to 11 May 2022 before Employment Judge Cox with lay members Mr M Elwen and Mr P Kent. The tribunal recorded that the allegation of direct discrimination in the allocation of shifts and the allegation of harassment at a meeting on 28 April 2021 were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment then states that all other allegations failed and were dismissed. The extracted text does not record any monetary award, and it does not set out further reasoning or any separate remedy findings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal recorded the allegation of direct discrimination in the allocation of shifts as dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The tribunal recorded the allegation of harassment at a meeting on 28 April 2021 as dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Other | The tribunal stated that all other allegations failed and were dismissed, but the extracted judgment text does not identify those allegations individually. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.