Case 1804509/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Elliott (solicitor) For the v Mr Creamore (solicitor) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1804509/2023
- Decision date
- 8 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Elliott (solicitor) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing by CVP before Employment Judge Davies on 8 January 2024. The claimant was represented by Ms Elliott and the respondent by Mr Creamore. The only claim disposed of in the judgment was the claimant’s complaints of age-related harassment set out at paragraph 63(e) of the particulars of claim, which related to the treatment of the claimant during the redundancy process.
Those age-related harassment complaints were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment records that his remaining complaints would proceed in accordance with case management orders made that day. No remedy was awarded or assessed in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The claimant’s age-related harassment complaints at paragraph 63(e), concerning treatment during the redundancy process, were dismissed on withdrawal by him. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.