Case 1804591/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Keeley v The Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police AT A HEARING — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804591/2019
- Decision date
- 2 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr R Stead, Mr M Brewer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Keeley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs M Keeley brought claims against The Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police at a hearing in Leeds on 28 and 29 September and 1 October 2020. The tribunal, constituted by Employment Judge Lancaster with members Mr R Stead and Mr M Brewer, upheld two disability discrimination claims: unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability, and harassment related to disability.
The judgment records that compensation was awarded for injury to feelings in the agreed sum of £11,000. No separate split of that award between the two successful claims was given in the extracted judgment. The tribunal also ordered interest on that award in the agreed sum of £1,367.01.
No other claims, findings, or remedy components are recorded in the extracted text. The total award recorded from the judgment is £12,367.01.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal stated that the claim of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability succeeded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The tribunal stated that the claim of harassment related to disability succeeded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,367
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.