Case 1804645/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Wood v City of York Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 1804645/2023
- Decision date
- 13 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Armstrong Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Wood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal considered Mr M Wood's claim against City of York Council for unauthorised deductions from wages at Leeds Employment Tribunal by video on 11 October 2023. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr P Cairns, legal adviser.
Employment Judge Armstrong held that the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was brought within the time limit in s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996 and that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the claim. The written judgment does not determine whether any unauthorised deduction was made and records no monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records only that the unauthorised deductions from wages claim was brought within the time limit in s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996 and that the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear it. It does not record a substantive liability outcome or remedy. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.