Case 1804950/2020 · Employment Tribunal
A v B Heard: By CVP — 2021
- Case reference
- 1804950/2020
- Decision date
- 22 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant had not proven he was a disabled person at the material times. On that basis, the claimant's complaints of a failure to make reasonable adjustments, harassment and Section 15 discrimination were dismissed.
The judgment was given by Employment Judge JM Wade after a hearing by CVP on 18 October 2021, with the judgment dated 22 October 2021. No remedy was awarded because all complaints failed at the threshold issue of disability.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments. The tribunal found the claimant had not proven he was a disabled person at the material times. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Complaint of harassment. The tribunal found the claimant had not proven he was a disabled person at the material times. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of Section 15 discrimination. The tribunal found the claimant had not proven he was a disabled person at the material times. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.