Case 1805097/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Robson v NGP UTILITIES Ltd Heard by CVP — 2021
- Case reference
- 1805097/2019
- Decision date
- 16 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rogerson Members
- Panel members
- Ms J Noble, Ms B R Hodgkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Robson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr Robson worked for NGP Utilities Ltd from 7 January 2019 to 14 June 2019 in the Leeds office, where the culture was described in the reasons as involving daily racist, homophobic and antisemitic language. It accepted that his equal opportunities form recording that he was a gay man was left accessible to other employees on his first day, and that the office environment quickly became known to him through remarks such as Mr Manterfield's comment that there was "a fucking bender in the office".
On the harassment claim, the tribunal accepted Mr Robson's evidence about the pleaded incidents involving Mr Price, Mr Peat and Mr Dixon, including comments that two men having sex was "unnatural and not right", remarks about "Gay Pride" and "Straight Pride", the "mince a bit quicker" comment, jokes in the office WhatsApp group, the sweets incident, and Mr Dixon shouting "oi ya fucking faggot". It found all of those incidents amounted to unwanted conduct related to sexual orientation that had the purpose or effect of violating dignity and creating a degrading and humiliating environment. The respondent's statutory defence failed because its equality policies were found to be ineffective and not properly implemented, with no effective training, investigation or disciplinary response.
On the disability complaint, the tribunal accepted that Mr Robson was disabled by reason of dyslexia and that the respondent had knowledge of both the disability and the substantial disadvantage on 25 March 2019 when he supplied his diagnostic assessment. It found the respondent applied a call-time target of three hours per day, including interim timed targets, which placed him at a substantial disadvantage because he needed longer to complete associated administrative tasks. Although the overall target was later reduced to 2.5 hours, the tribunal found that adjustment was ineffective because the interim targets were not adjusted and the managers continued to pressure and reprimand him while he was visibly struggling.
The tribunal held that the cumulative sexual orientation harassment and disability discrimination amounted to a repudiatory breach of the implied term of trust and confidence, and that Mr Robson resigned in response to that breach on 14 June 2019, so his constructive dismissal claim succeeded. It also upheld the victimisation claim, finding that the solicitor's letter of 26 July 2019 contained an unjustified threat about the High Court injunction and was sent, at least in significant part, because Mr High and the respondent did not want the harassment allegations brought before the Employment Tribunal.
On remedy, the tribunal rejected the claim for commission or other pecuniary loss, finding that Mr Robson had not proved he would have earned the commission claimed and noting that his salary with A2L Energy was higher than with the respondent. It awarded £20,800 for injury to feelings and £10,000 for aggravated damages, with interest of £5,907, making a total award of £36,707. It also made a separate financial penalty order of £18,353.50 to the Secretary of State under s.12A Employment Tribunals Act 1996 because of the aggravating features it identified in the respondent's conduct and conduct of the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Sexual orientation harassment claim. The tribunal upheld all pleaded allegations and rejected the respondent's statutory defence under s.109 Equality Act 2010. | Upheld | Sexual orientation | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments for dyslexia. The tribunal found the duty was engaged on 25 March 2019 and that the 2.5 hour reduction to the call-time target was ineffective. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Found to be a constructive dismissal caused by the cumulative sexual orientation harassment, disability discrimination, and the respondent's failure to make effective adjustments. | Upheld | — | — |
| Victimisation | The protected act was the claimant's complaint email of 19 July 2019; the detriment was the solicitor's letter of 26 July 2019 threatening to mention the High Court injunction if he pursued tribunal proceedings. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £36,707
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £10,000
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
12 references- s.136 Equality Act 2010 burden of proof
- s.109 Equality Act 2010 vicarious liability
- s.26 Equality Act 2010 harassment
- s.20 and s.21 Equality Act 2010 reasonable adjustments
- s.27 Equality Act 2010 victimisation
- Environment Agency v Rowan
- Nagarajan v London Regional Transport
- Igen v Wong
- Chagger v Abbey National Plc
- Prison Service v Johnson
- Bethnal Green and Shoreditch Trust v Dippenaar
- s.12A Employment Tribunals Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.