Case 1805273/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Lomas — 2021
- Case reference
- 1805273/2020
- Decision date
- 26 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs J Greaves, succeeded on her complaint of unfair dismissal against the National Day Nurseries Association. The tribunal held that the complaint was well founded and awarded her £3,858 by way of compensatory award. The judgment does not separately identify any basic award, and it records that the recoupment regulations apply to the award.
The claimant's complaint in relation to holiday pay was dismissed. The judgment gives no further explanation of the holiday pay issue. For the compensatory award, the tribunal stated that the prescribed period was 11 September 2020 to 31 October 2020, the prescribed element was £3,358, and the amount by which the award exceeded the prescribed element was £500 in respect of lost statutory rights.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal complaint well founded and made a compensatory award of £3,858. The judgment does not separately state a basic award. | Upheld | — | £3,858 |
| Holiday pay | The complaint in relation to holiday pay was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,858
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,858
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.