Case 1805345/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Hollings (lay representative) v Mr D. Charity (Consultant) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1805345/2020
- Decision date
- 12 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Panel members
- Mr Lannaman, Ms Hiser
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Hollings (lay representative)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Leeds on 8-9 April 2021 before Employment Judge JM Wade with lay members Mr Lannaman and Ms Hiser, found that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The judgment text does not set out the factual reasons for that finding in the extracted version provided, and it does not record any monetary award.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's allegation of a discriminatory appeal. The extracted text refers only to that issue in general terms, so the precise factual basis for the discrimination finding is not set out here. The complaint of harassment failed. No separate remedy figures are recorded in the extracted text for any claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The extracted judgment text refers only to 'a discriminatory appeal'; the case listing identifies the matter as sex discrimination. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Harassment | The extracted judgment text does not specify the protected characteristic in this sentence; the case listing identifies the matter as sex discrimination. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.