Case 1805488/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Butt v Simpson Millar LLP — 2021
- Case reference
- 1805488/2021
- Decision date
- 22 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Evans
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Butt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Butt worked for Simpson Millar LLP as a finance business partner from 15 April 2019 until 30 September 2021. He claimed that the respondent had failed to pay two instalments of his 2020 bonus, each said to be £1,833.33, and the tribunal treated the case as a claim for unlawful deductions from wages and, alternatively, breach of contract.
The tribunal accepted that the 2020 Bonus Scheme General Criteria made bonus payments discretionary and non-contractual, and that the scheme could be varied or withdrawn without notice. Although the respondent's 29 March 2021 letter said Mr Butt had achieved a £5,500 bonus and would be paid in three instalments in April, July and October 2021, the tribunal held that the letter did not convert the discretionary scheme into a contractual right to fixed payments on fixed dates.
The tribunal found that the respondent was entitled under clause 20 to vary the timing of the bonus payments, including the later decision to move the July and October 2021 instalments. It also found that the respondent's decision not to pay the outstanding instalments was not irrational or perverse, noting the business logic for the delay and the leaver provision requiring the employee to be employed at the date of payment.
Mr Butt resigned on 9 September 2021 and his employment ended on 30 September 2021. By the time the October instalment would have fallen due, he was no longer employed, so the leaver provision meant he was not entitled to that payment. The tribunal therefore dismissed both the unlawful deductions claim and the breach of contract claim. The respondent's separate breach of contract claim was withdrawn at the hearing and dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claimant said the respondent failed to pay two bonus instalments of £1,833.33, one in July 2021 and one on termination on 30 September 2021. The tribunal found nothing was properly payable on either date. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Alternative claim based on the same alleged non-payment of bonus instalments. The tribunal held the 2020 bonus scheme remained discretionary and non-contractual, so there was no breach. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.27 ERA 1996
- irrational or perverse
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.