Case 1805609/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Bamidale Iluyamade v Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 1805609/2020
- Decision date
- 7 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Ms J Hiser, Mr M Brewer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Bamidale Iluyamade
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds on 5, 6 and 7 July 2021 by Employment Judge D N Jones sitting with lay members Ms J Hiser and Mr M Brewer. The claimant, Mr Bamidale Iluyamade, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The judgment records that all members of the tribunal agreed the decision.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim brought under general principles and also dismissed the separate claim based on protected disclosures. It further dismissed the race discrimination claim and the victimisation claim.
The only monetary order recorded in the judgment was that the claimant's £30 deposits, paid under the order dated 12 February 2021, were to be paid to the respondent. No award was made to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment dismisses the unfair dismissal claim brought under general principles. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment dismisses the claim based on protected disclosures. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.