Case 1805651/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Taylor v Key Changes – Unlocking Womens Potential (A Company Limited By Guarantee) THE RESPONDENT in a response presented on the 27 June 2018 having stated that no part of the claim is contested — 2018
- Case reference
- 1805651/2018
- Decision date
- 26 July 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Dated
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent’s response stated that no part of the claim was contested, and the tribunal issued judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for unauthorised deduction from wages succeeded, and the respondent was ordered to pay £2,341.55, described as the amount deducted.
The separate complaint concerning payment for leave taken, or payment in lieu of accrued but untaken leave, also succeeded under regulations 13, 14 and 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal ordered payment of £975.62 forthwith. The listed hearing for 26 July 2018 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,342 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £976 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,317
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Section 24 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulations 13, 14 and 30 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.