Case 1805935/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Rhodes v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805935/2021
- Decision date
- 14 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Knowles Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Rhodes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the Claimant's claim of harassment under Section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 under rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules.
The judgment states that this did not affect the Claimant's claim of discrimination arising from disability under Section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 or his claim of unfair dismissal under Section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, both of which were to proceed to a final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The judgment strikes out the harassment claim under rule 37(1)(a). It does not state in the extracted text which protected characteristic the harassment claim related to. The separate claims of discrimination arising from disability and unfair dismissal were expressly unaffected and were to proceed to a final hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Section 26 Equality Act 2010
- rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunal Rules
- Section 15 Equality Act 2010
- Section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.