Case 1805963/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805963/2021
- Decision date
- 17 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A James
- Venue
- Sheffield
- Panel members
- Mr M Lewis, Mr G Corbett
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Sheffield on 9-13, 16 and 17 January 2023 before Employment Judge A James, with Mr M Lewis and Mr G Corbett sitting as lay members. The claimant, Ms Yvonne Hepworth, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The judgment records claims for unfair constructive dismissal under s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996, direct sex discrimination under s.13 Equality Act 2010, harassment related to sex under s.26 Equality Act 2010, and victimisation under s.27 Equality Act 2010.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.26 Equality Act 2010
- s.27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.