Case 1806172/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Ambler v Doing More Print Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1806172/2024
- Decision date
- 12 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd ORDERS
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Ambler
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 determination by Employment Judge Shepherd sitting at the Leeds Employment Tribunal, the claims having been issued on 27 March 2024 and 2 July 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Judge decided a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the Tribunal's own initiative, the Judge ordered under Rule 34 that DM Print Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) and Globewell Partners Ltd be removed from the proceedings, being satisfied that following a TUPE transfer Doing More Print Limited is the correct name of the claimant's former employer and is the correct respondent.
The Tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £2,506.50 gross; that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £15,861.00; and that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, ordering payment of £552.75 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment following the respondent's failure to present a valid response on time. Tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages; gross sum ordered. | Upheld | — | £2,507 |
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment. Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £15,861 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment. Tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement; gross sum ordered. Classified under holiday_pay (Working Time Regulations) per the gov.uk listing category 'Working Time Regulations'. | Upheld | — | £553 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £18,920
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 34 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.