Case 1806173/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S J Reay v Doing More Print Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1806173/2024
- Decision date
- 12 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd ORDERS
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S J Reay
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThese were linked claims under case numbers 1806173/2024, 1801823/2024 and 1801023/2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so Employment Judge Shepherd proceeded under Rule 21 and made a determination on the papers.
The judge removed DM Print Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) and Globewell Partners Ltd from the proceedings under Rule 34. The tribunal was satisfied that, following a TUPE transfer, Doing More Print Limited was the claimant’s former employer and therefore the correct respondent.
On the substantive claims, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £2,333.17 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £11,250.00, and that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and must pay £99.99 gross. The combined monetary award recorded in the judgment was £13,683.16.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross amount of £2,333.17. | Upheld | — | £2,333 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £11,250.00. | Upheld | — | £11,250 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to unpaid holiday entitlement; classified here as holiday_pay. The tribunal ordered payment of the gross amount of £99.99. | Upheld | — | £100 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,683
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21
- Rule 34
- TUPE transfer
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.