Case 1806410/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Good and Co Solicitors — 2020
- Case reference
- 1806410/2019
- Decision date
- 22 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs A Kauser brought claims against Good and Co Solicitors arising from her dismissal on 22 August 2019 and from a comment made on 14 December 2018. Employment Judge Buckley sat alone at Leeds on 22 January 2020. The judgment records that the automatic unfair dismissal complaint under s.99 Employment Rights Act 1996 was struck out, as were the claims that the dismissal amounted to direct sex discrimination under s.13 Equality Act 2010 and direct pregnancy and maternity discrimination under s.18 Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal also dealt with complaints based on the 14 December 2018 comment. It found that the complaints of harassment related to sex under s.26 Equality Act 2010 and direct pregnancy and maternity discrimination under s.18 Equality Act 2010 were presented out of time. The tribunal decided it was not just and equitable to extend time, and those complaints were dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal under s.99 Employment Rights Act 1996 was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination arising from the dismissal on 22 August 2019 was struck out under s.13 Equality Act 2010. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Direct pregnancy and maternity discrimination arising from the dismissal on 22 August 2019 was struck out under s.18 Equality Act 2010. | Struck out | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Harassment | The complaint that the comment on 14 December 2018 amounted to harassment related to sex under s.26 Equality Act 2010 was not presented in time and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The complaint that the comment on 14 December 2018 amounted to direct pregnancy and maternity discrimination under s.18 Equality Act 2010 was not presented in time and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.99 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.18 Equality Act 2010
- s.26 Equality Act 2010
- not just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.