Case 1806531/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Provatas v DHL Services Limited Heard: in Sheffield on 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th and 17th January 2025 — 2024
- Case reference
- 1806531/2022
- Decision date
- 17 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ayre
- Panel members
- Mrs J L Hiser, Mr K Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Provatas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr M Provatas, was employed by DHL Services Limited as an HGV driver from 1 July 2013 until his resignation on 5 January 2023. He brought claims of indirect race discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, harassment related to race and disability, victimisation, constructive unfair dismissal, and unauthorised deduction from wages. The respondent admitted the wages claim and was ordered by consent to pay £235. All remaining claims failed and were dismissed.
On the constructive dismissal claim, the Tribunal found that some matters did amount to breaches of the implied term of trust and confidence, including the issuing of a final written warning in July 2022 (which the Tribunal described as harsh given little consideration was given to medical reasons) and the decision to suspend the claimant on 10 July 2022. However, the Tribunal found that the claimant had waived those breaches by delaying almost six months before resigning and by taking steps such as raising a grievance, attending a grievance hearing, appealing, and engaging in further meetings, thereby affirming the contract.
On the discrimination claims, the Tribunal rejected the indirect race discrimination, reasonable adjustments, harassment and victimisation complaints. A late respondent application to amend the response to plead justification for the indirect discrimination claim was refused as it was made at a very late stage in the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Succeeded by consent/admission by the respondent; respondent ordered to pay £235. | Upheld | — | £235 |
| Race discrimination | Indirect race discrimination claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim of failure to make reasonable adjustments failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to race and disability failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal claim failed; tribunal found the claimant had affirmed the contract by delay and continued engagement before resigning. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £235
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.