Case 1806582/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Lindley v NHS England and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 1806582/2023
- Decision date
- 24 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr M Lindley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing, the Tribunal recorded that specified claims against the First Respondent were dismissed upon withdrawal. Those claims were failure to make reasonable adjustments, indirect disability discrimination, harassment related to disability, harassment related to religious belief except in respect of the chat forum posts on 22 March 2023, and victimisation arising from any alleged breach of the disability discrimination provisions in the Equality Act 2010.
The Tribunal also recorded that any claims against the Second Respondent were dismissed upon withdrawal. The Second Respondent was therefore dismissed from further proceedings.
The judgment does not record any remedy or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments claim against the First Respondent dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect disability discrimination claim against the First Respondent dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to disability claim against the First Respondent dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to religious belief claim against the First Respondent dismissed upon withdrawal, except in respect of the chat forum posts on 22 March 2023. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation arising in respect of any alleged breach of the disability discrimination provisions in the Equality Act 2010 against the First Respondent dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Other | Any claims against the Second Respondent were dismissed upon withdrawal; the judgment does not specify their legal basis. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.