Case 1806598/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Moubarrir Jouhari v Apollo Endosurgery UK Limited Heard: In Leeds In Person — 2022
- Case reference
- 1806598/2021
- Decision date
- 29 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Panel members
- Mr G Harker, Mr G Corbett
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Moubarrir Jouhari
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting in Leeds before Employment Judge JM Wade with Mr G Harker and Mr G Corbett, heard the case from 26 to 29 September 2022. It found that Ms M Moubarrir Jouhari’s complaint of victimisation by dismissal succeeded, but her other victimisation allegations failed.
It dismissed the allegations of race discrimination and race-related harassment. It also found direct age discrimination and direct sex discrimination in relation to training, while dismissing the remaining age- and sex-related discrimination and harassment allegations.
The claimant pursued no recommendations. The tribunal awarded £20,000 for injury to feelings, £2,000 for lost earnings, interest of £1,600 and £160 respectively, and said the total payable was £23,760. It also recorded that the recoupment regulations did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination concerning training succeeded; other sex discrimination allegations were dismissed. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Sex-related harassment allegations were dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation by dismissal succeeded; other victimisation allegations were dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Race discrimination allegations were dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Race-related harassment allegations were dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Age discrimination | Direct age discrimination concerning training succeeded; other age discrimination allegations were dismissed. | Upheld | Age | — |
| Harassment | Age-related harassment allegations were dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £23,760
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,000
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.