Case 1806680/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Wade v Doing More Print Limited and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 1806680/2024
- Decision date
- 4 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs J Wade
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claims were brought in the Leeds Employment Tribunal on 12 May 2024 and 11 June 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response in time, and Employment Judge Maidment determined the claims under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On the claimant's confirmation that Doing More Print Limited was her correct former employer, Globewell Partners Ltd was removed as a respondent.
The Tribunal found that the first respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and had dismissed her in breach of contract in respect of notice, ordering payment of a total gross sum of £3,926.19. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,270.22 gross.
The Tribunal further found that the claimant had been unfairly dismissed by the first respondent and ordered the respondent to pay her a basic award of £14,467.50 as compensation for unfair dismissal. The judgment as presented does not record a separate compensatory award, interest figure, or any working time claim outcome beyond the holiday pay element.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Combined gross award of £3,926.19 covers both the unauthorised deductions from wages and the breach of contract (notice) claim; the judgment does not split the figure between the two. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in respect of notice pay. Combined with the unlawful deduction of wages claim into a single gross award of £3,926.19; not separately quantified. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as a separate gross sum for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,270 |
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award only is stated in the judgment text; no compensatory award is mentioned. | Upheld | — | £14,468 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,664
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £14,468
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.