Case 1806697/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Daniela Serban v Sargents Bakeries Ltd PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 1806697/2020
- Decision date
- 9 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Daniela Serban
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote preliminary hearing before Employment Judge R S Drake sitting alone, the tribunal considered Ms Daniela Serban's complaints of direct religious discrimination, harassment, and unfair dismissal against Sargents Bakeries Ltd. The tribunal found that the last date of any alleged act was 19 December 2019. On that basis, the primary limitation periods expired on 18 March 2020, but ACAS early conciliation was not started until 29 May 2020 and the tribunal claim was not presented until 13 November 2020.
For the Equality Act complaints, the tribunal applied the section 123 EqA 2010 time-limit test and referred to the authorities it listed, including Dedman, Palmer & Saunders, British Coal v Keeble, Robertson, Simms v Transco, Afolabi, and DCA v Jones. It found that Ms Serban had access to union advice before the primary period expired, that she was capable of using IT and researching her position, and that she had received responses to her grievances by 20 February 2020. The tribunal did not accept that there was a satisfactory explanation for the delay, found no obstacle created by the Respondent, and concluded that a 240-day delay beyond the primary period was not just and equitable to extend.
The tribunal therefore dismissed the discrimination complaint as out of time and outside its jurisdiction. For unfair dismissal, it applied section 111(2) ERA 1996 and held that Ms Serban had not shown it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim within the primary period, so the claim had to be struck out. No monetary remedy was awarded because all claims failed at the preliminary time-limit stage.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment describes this as direct religious discrimination and dismisses the discrimination claim as out of time and therefore outside the tribunal's jurisdiction. The reasons deal with limitation rather than the merits. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Harassment | Harassment is expressly mentioned in the reasons as part of the discrimination complaints. The final disposal is collective and time-limit based; the judgment does not set out separate harassment-specific findings. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the claim was presented outside the s.111(2) ERA 1996 primary time limit and that it was not shown to be not reasonably practicable to present it in time. It therefore said the unfair dismissal claim must be struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- s.123 EqA 2010 just and equitable extension
- s.111(2) ERA 1996 not reasonably practicable
- Dedman v British Building & Engineering Appliances Ltd
- Palmer & Saunders v Southend BC
- British Coal v Keeble
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre
- Simms v Transco
- Afolabi v Southwark BC
- DCA v Jones
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.