Case 1806831/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Ayche Respondent (1): Cheers Bro Ltd (t/a Peddler Market) Respondent (2): The Hop Box Ltd (t/a Peddler Market) HELD in Sheffield v Mr B Smith, Director — 2021
- Case reference
- 1806831/2020
- Decision date
- 1 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain Members
- Panel members
- Mr D Crowe, Mr K Lannaman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Ayche Respondent (1): Cheers Bro Ltd (t/a Peddler Market) Respondent (2): The Hop Box Ltd (t/a Peddler Market) HELD in Sheffield
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sitting in Sheffield on 9 August 2021, with Employment Judge Brain and lay members Mr D Crowe and Mr K Lannaman, dismissed the complaints against the first respondent, Cheers Bro Ltd (t/a Peddler Market), because it had no involvement in the matters concerned. It also found that, at all material times on 2 and 3 October 2020, the claimant was a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010.
All complaints against the second respondent, The Hop Box Ltd (t/a Peddler Market), were dismissed. Those complaints were direct discrimination because of disability, unfavourable treatment arising in consequence of disability, harassment related to disability, and failure to make reasonable adjustments.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. No monetary remedy was awarded or recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination upon the grounds of disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Unfavourable treatment for something arising in consequence of disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to comply with the duty to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.