Case 1806922/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Maroof First v Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 1806922/2020
- Decision date
- 21 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Maroof First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 7 July 2021, Employment Judge Buckley struck out all of the claimant’s direct race discrimination claims except the complaint set out in paragraph 8 of the case management order of Employment Judge Rostant dated 14 May 2021. The struck-out claims were held to have no reasonable prospects of success.
The remaining complaint concerned the claimant’s unsuccessful application for a further Band 8b post in July 2020. The order records that the claimant compared himself to the successful candidate and alleged that the refusal was an act of direct discrimination. The interview panel comprised Mr Siddiqi, Mr Ahmed and Mr Jones. This judgment did not decide the merits of that remaining claim and did not record any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | All of the claimant’s direct race discrimination claims, except the complaint described in paragraph 8 of the case management order dated 14 May 2021, were struck out as having no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | The direct race discrimination complaint about the claimant’s unsuccessful application for a further Band 8b post in July 2020 was not struck out at this hearing and was recorded as the remaining claim to proceed. No merits finding was made in this judgment. | Other | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.