Case 1807092/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Morgan v The Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police — 2020
- Case reference
- 1807092/2019
- Decision date
- 1 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Morgan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment on withdrawal dated 1 October 2020. Employment Judge Cox recorded that the claims at paragraphs 5 and 16 of the 'Discussion' section of the Order of 29 January 2020 were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant, Ms S Morgan.
The judgment does not identify the substantive nature of those two claims in the extracted text. It records only that they were dismissed because they were withdrawn, rather than determined on their merits.
The judge also noted that the claimant's remaining claims would proceed to hearing on 26 to 30 October 2020. No remedy or monetary award is recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim referred to at paragraph 5 of the 'Discussion' section of the Order of 29 January 2020 was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment does not identify the substantive type of claim in this text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claim referred to at paragraph 16 of the 'Discussion' section of the Order of 29 January 2020 was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment does not identify the substantive type of claim in this text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.