Case 1807128/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Dewrow v ISS Mediclean Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1807128/2019
- Decision date
- 8 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Ms L Fawcett, Mr DW Fields
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Dewrow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant was employed by ISS Mediclean Limited as a kitchen manager and was seconded to act as Unison convenor for the Wakefield Partnership. The Tribunal found that, although the Respondent maintained a position that it did not recognise a full-time convenor role for its own employees, the Claimant was in fact appointed under the secondment agreement as convenor for the Wakefield Partnership, including the Respondent's employees, and carried out trade union activities at an appropriate time.
Most of the pleaded trade union detriment allegations were dismissed. The Tribunal found that several communications denying that the Claimant was the Respondent's convenor were made to maintain the Respondent's position about recognition, rather than for the main purpose of preventing or deterring trade union activities. It also found that the St Michael's School complaint and related investigatory steps were pursued to investigate that complaint, not for the proscribed purpose.
The section 146 TULRCA complaint succeeded in relation to the refusal or failure to allow the convenor secondment to continue. The Tribunal found that the secondment was not limited to a fixed two-year term, continued third-party funding was available, there was no operational need for the Claimant to return to the kitchen manager role, and the Respondent's main purpose in ending or not extending the secondment was to prevent or deter the Claimant's trade union activities. The Claimant reasonably viewed the loss of the full-time convenor role and potential return to a shop steward role with reduced scope as a detriment.
The Tribunal held that the same conduct amounted to a fundamental breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. The proposed final straw on 16 September 2019 was not itself conduct of the Respondent because the communication came from Engie, but the Claimant had not affirmed the contract and the refusal to continue the secondment was an effective cause of her resignation. The Tribunal found that she was constructively dismissed and that the principal reason for the Respondent's breach was her taking part in trade union activities at an appropriate time, so the automatic unfair dismissal complaint under section 152 TULRCA succeeded. Remedy was reserved for a separate hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Section 146 TULRCA detriment complaint upheld only in respect of the Respondent failing or refusing to allow the Claimant's secondment as trade union convenor to continue. | Upheld | — | — |
| Trade union | The remaining trade union detriment complaints under section 146 TULRCA were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal under section 152 TULRCA was upheld. The Tribunal found the Claimant was constructively dismissed and that her trade union activities were the principal reason for the breach causing resignation. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
11 references- s.146 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.148 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Gallagher v Department of Transport
- North Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust v Bone
- Yewdall v The Secretary of State for Work & Pensions
- s.152 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.95 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- Mahmud v Bank of Credit and Commerce International
- London Borough of Waltham Forest v Omilaju
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.