Case 1808511/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Leworthy v The Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police — 2024
- Case reference
- 1808511/2023
- Decision date
- 25 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Ms. Arshad-Mather, Mr. Downes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Leworthy
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Leeds before Employment Judge Shepherd with members Ms Arshad-Mather and Mr Downes, unanimously dismissed all of the claimant's claims.
It found that the disability discrimination claims were not well-founded and dismissed them. It also found that the direct sex discrimination claims were not well-founded and dismissed them.
The tribunal further found that the harassment claims related to the protected characteristics of disability and sex were not well-founded and dismissed them. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons are included in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | Judgment specifies direct sex discrimination. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.