Case 1808906/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M K Porozynska v Challenge-trg Recruitment Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1808906/2023
- Decision date
- 27 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Robertson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M K Porozynska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs M K Porozynska withdrew her claims against Challenge-TRG Recruitment Limited. The judgment records that she had claimed she was dismissed, described as constructively or otherwise, in or around April 2023, that the dismissal amounted to unfair dismissal including an automatic unfair dismissal allegation under section 99 Employment Rights Act 1996, and that the same matters amounted to pregnancy or maternity discrimination under section 18 Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal recorded those claims as dismissed upon withdrawal and made no merits findings or monetary award. Employment Judge L Robertson signed the written record on 27 June 2024. The notes state that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time by a party.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant withdrew her claim that she was dismissed, described as "constructively or otherwise", in or around April 2023 and that this amounted to unfair dismissal, including an allegation of automatic unfair dismissal under section 99 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The claimant withdrew her pregnancy or maternity discrimination claim under section 18 Equality Act 2010. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.