Case 1808946/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Parr v Asda Stores Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1808946/2023
- Decision date
- 12 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Parr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Midgley, sitting alone at Bristol by video on 23 August 2024, heard a claim by Mr D Parr against Asda Stores Limited that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from his wages. The claimant was represented by Mr J Calverley of Citizens Advice Bureau and the respondent by Mr R Lassey of Counsel.
The tribunal held that the claim was well founded and succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £4,306.54, being 16 weeks of pay between 15 August 2023 and 4 December 2023 at a weekly rate of £307.61 (£4,921.76), less £615.22 already received.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons would only be produced on request made at the hearing or within 14 days of the written judgment being sent. The judgment was sent to the parties on 12 October 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the claim of unauthorised deductions from wages well founded. Award calculated as 16 weeks (15 August 2023 to 4 December 2023) at £307.61 per week (£4,921.76) less £615.22 already received. | Upheld | — | £4,307 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,307
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.