Case 1809338/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R E Beasley v Bentley Fencing Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1809338/2024
- Decision date
- 4 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tegerdine Representation
- Venue
- Sheffield
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R E Beasley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis remedy judgment followed an earlier judgment of 14 March 2025, issued under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure, which upheld the claimant's complaints. Employment Judge Tegerdine heard the remedy hearing by video at Sheffield on 4 April 2025. The respondent did not attend.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,800 gross for unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of unpaid wages between 9 August and 30 August 2024. It also ordered £1,150.80 gross for 8 days of accrued but untaken holiday for the period from 1 January 2024 to 30 August 2024, calculated at £143.85 per day, and recorded that the holiday payment was an unauthorised deduction from wages.
The tribunal further ordered gross notice pay of £8,630.77, based on 12 weeks' statutory notice at £719.24 per week, and a statutory redundancy payment of £21,000.00, calculated as 20 years x 1.5 x the statutory cap of £700 per week. The sums were due on or before 20 April 2025. This remedy judgment does not set out a separate monetary award for the unfair dismissal complaint referenced through the earlier liability judgment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross sum ordered for unpaid wages between 9 August and 30 August 2024. | Upheld | — | £1,800 |
| Holiday pay | 8 days' accrued but untaken holiday for the period 1 January 2024 to 30 August 2024, calculated at £143.85 per day; the judgment characterises this as an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,151 |
| Breach of contract | Gross notice pay of 12 weeks' statutory notice at £719.24 per week. | Upheld | — | £8,631 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment calculated as 20 years x 1.5 x the statutory cap of £700 per week. | Upheld | — | £21,000 |
| Unfair dismissal | The remedy judgment refers to an earlier rule 22 judgment of 14 March 2025 upholding the claimant's complaints, but this document does not set out a separate unfair dismissal monetary award. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £32,582
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.