Loading…

Bentley Fencing Limited — employment tribunal cases | Tribunal Watch

Employer file

Employment tribunal cases against Bentley Fencing Limited

Since 2017, Bentley Fencing Limited has appeared as a respondent in 8 employment tribunal cases, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Total cases: 8
Total awarded against: £0
Largest award: —
Most common claim: Breach of contract

Indexed: 5 May 2026

Cases by claim type

5 distinct categories

#	Claim type	Cases
01	Breach of contract	8
02	Redundancy	8
03	Unfair dismissal	8
04	Unlawful deduction from wages	8
05	Working time regulations	8

All cases

8 cases · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
1809345/2024	4 April 2025	England & Wales	Mr G McDonald Kelly	Breach of contract, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations	—
1809340/2024	4 April 2025	England & Wales	Mr J Underwood	Breach of contract, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations	—
1809343/2024	4 April 2025	England & Wales	Mr S Partlow	Breach of contract, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations	—
1809341/2024	4 April 2025	England & Wales	Mr B D Turner	Breach of contract, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations	—
1809338/2024	4 April 2025	England & Wales	Mr R E Beasley	Breach of contract, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations	—
1809344/2024	4 April 2025	England & Wales	Mrs B A Sargent	Breach of contract, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations	—
1809342/2024	4 April 2025	England & Wales	Mr G McCarthy	Breach of contract, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations	—

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Outcomes and compensation are not yet populated for every case — see how the data is built.