Case 1809341/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B D Turner v Bentley Fencing Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1809341/2024
- Decision date
- 4 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tegerdine Representation
- Venue
- Sheffield
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B D Turner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remedy hearing at Sheffield by video on 4 April 2025 before Employment Judge Tegerdine. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal recorded that it had already issued a judgment on 14 March 2025 upholding the claimant's complaints under rule 22, and this written judgment set out the resulting awards.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,560 gross for unpaid wages between 9 August and 30 August 2024. It also found that the claimant had been left with 11 days of accrued but untaken holiday at the end of employment on 30 August 2024, and awarded £1,295.80 gross for that holiday entitlement.
In addition, the tribunal awarded £1,767 gross notice pay, calculated as 12 weeks' statutory notice at £658 per week, and a statutory redundancy payment of £883.50 calculated by reference to 3 years' service at 0.5 times £589 per week. The tribunal ordered the sums to be paid by 20 April 2025. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross award for unpaid wages between 9 August and 30 August 2024. | Upheld | — | £1,560 |
| Holiday pay | Award for 11 days' accrued but untaken holiday ending on 30 August 2024; described as an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,296 |
| Breach of contract | Gross notice pay calculated as 12 weeks' statutory notice at £658 per week. | Upheld | — | £1,767 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment calculated as 3 years x 0.5 x £589 per week. | Upheld | — | £884 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,506
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.