Case 1809345/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G McDonald Kelly v Bentley Fencing Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1809345/2024
- Decision date
- 4 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tegerdine Representation
- Venue
- Sheffield
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G McDonald Kelly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a remedy judgment following an earlier liability judgment dated 14 March 2025, in which the Tribunal upheld the claimant's complaints in accordance with rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. The remedy hearing took place at Sheffield by video on 4 April 2025 before Employment Judge Tegerdine; the claimant was represented by Mr R Beasley as a lay representative and the respondent did not attend.
The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,380.00 for unauthorised deduction from wages covering unpaid wages between 9 August and 30 August 2024, and £1,391.60 in respect of 14 days of accrued but untaken holiday (calculated at £99.40 per day) for the period from 1 January 2024 to the termination date of 30 August 2024, which the Tribunal characterised as a further unauthorised deduction from wages. The Tribunal also ordered gross notice pay of £5,964.00, representing 12 weeks' statutory notice at £497 per week, and a statutory redundancy payment of £14,910.00, calculated as 20 years x 1.5 x £497 per week.
The respondent was ordered to pay the sums due on or before 20 April 2025. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The document is a remedy judgment only and does not set out the substantive reasoning of the earlier liability decision.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages between 9 August and 30 August 2024. | Upheld | — | £1,380 |
| Holiday pay | Treated by the tribunal as an unauthorised deduction from wages for 14 days' accrued but untaken holiday (14 x £99.40). | Upheld | — | £1,392 |
| Breach of contract | Gross notice pay of 12 weeks' statutory notice x £497 per week. | Upheld | — | £5,964 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment (20 years x 1.5 x £497 per week). | Upheld | — | £14,910 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment on remedy refers to a liability judgment dated 14 March 2025 upholding the claimant's complaints under rule 22; unfair dismissal was a gov.uk listing category and is recorded as upheld, but no separate remedy figure for unfair dismissal compensation is contained in this remedy judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £23,646
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.