Case 1809346/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Wootton v Bentley Fencing Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1809346/2024
- Decision date
- 4 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tegerdine Representation
- Venue
- Sheffield
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Wootton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remedy judgment following an earlier liability decision of 14 March 2025, in which the tribunal had upheld the claimant’s complaints under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. The remedy hearing took place at Sheffield by video on 4 April 2025 before Employment Judge Tegerdine; the claimant was represented by a lay representative and the respondent did not attend.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,680 gross for unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 9–30 August 2024, £1,456 gross for 13 days’ accrued but untaken holiday (13 x £112) treated as an unauthorised deduction, £6,720 gross for 12 weeks’ statutory notice pay (at £560 per week), and a statutory redundancy payment of £16,800 (20 years x 1.5 x £560 per week).
The judge noted that the redundancy figure had initially been awarded at the £18,660 claimed by the claimant, but on checking after the hearing the judge identified that the claimant’s calculation was incorrect and corrected the figure to £16,800. The respondent was ordered to pay the sums due on or before 20 April 2025. Reasons were given orally; written reasons will only be issued on request within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages for the period 9 August – 30 August 2024. | Upheld | — | £1,680 |
| Holiday pay | Treated by the tribunal as an unauthorised deduction from wages for 13 days’ accrued but untaken holiday (13 x £112) between 1 January 2024 and 30 August 2024. | Upheld | — | £1,456 |
| Breach of contract | Statutory notice pay of 12 weeks x £560. | Upheld | — | £6,720 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment calculated as 20 years x 1.5 x £560. The judge corrected the claimant’s original figure of £18,660 to £16,800. | Upheld | — | £16,800 |
| Unfair dismissal | Liability judgment upholding the claimant’s complaints was issued on 14 March 2025 under rule 22; this remedy judgment does not itemise a separate compensatory award for unfair dismissal. Listing categories included unfair dismissal but the remedy document does not specify a distinct unfair dismissal award. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £26,656
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.