Case 1809344/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B A Sargent v Bentley Fencing Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1809344/2024
- Decision date
- 4 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tegerdine Representation
- Venue
- Sheffield
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B A Sargent
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a video hearing in Sheffield on 4 April 2025 before Employment Judge Tegerdine, with the claimant represented by Mr R Beasley and the respondent not attending, the Tribunal made a remedy judgment after issuing a rule 22 judgment on 14 March 2025 upholding the claimant's complaints. It awarded £630 gross for unpaid wages between 9 August 2024 and 30 August 2024 and £490 gross for 7 days' accrued but untaken holiday, calculated at £70 per day.
The Tribunal also awarded £2,100 gross notice pay, representing 10 weeks' statutory notice at £210 per week, and £3,150 as a statutory redundancy payment based on 10 years' service at 1.5 weeks' pay per year. The sums were ordered to be paid by 20 April 2025. The written record notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross award for unpaid wages between 9 August 2024 and 30 August 2024. | Upheld | — | £630 |
| Holiday pay | 7 days' accrued but untaken holiday at termination, calculated at £70 per day for the period 1 January 2024 to 30 August 2024. | Upheld | — | £490 |
| Breach of contract | Gross notice pay, calculated as 10 weeks' statutory notice at £210 per week. | Upheld | — | £2,100 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment calculated as 10 years x 1.5 x £210 per week. | Upheld | — | £3,150 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,370
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.