Case 1809343/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Partlow v Bentley Fencing Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1809343/2024
- Decision date
- 4 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tegerdine Representation
- Venue
- Sheffield
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Partlow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a remedy judgment following an earlier liability judgment issued on 14 March 2025 under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure, which upheld the claimant's complaints. The respondent did not attend the remedy hearing on 4 April 2025, which was conducted by video before Employment Judge Tegerdine sitting at Sheffield.
The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,380.00 gross for unauthorised deduction from wages covering unpaid wages between 9 August and 30 August 2024, and a further £1,093.40 gross for 11 days of accrued but untaken holiday (1 January 2024 to 30 August 2024) at £99.40 per day, also characterised as an unauthorised deduction. The Tribunal further ordered gross notice pay of £5,964.00, calculated as 12 weeks' statutory notice at £497 per week, and a statutory redundancy payment of £14,910.00, calculated as 20 years x 1.5 x £497 per week.
The respondent was ordered to pay the sums due on or before 20 April 2025. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages for the period 9 August – 30 August 2024. | Upheld | — | £1,380 |
| Holiday pay | Characterised by the tribunal as an unauthorised deduction from wages for 11 days' accrued but untaken holiday (1 January 2024 to 30 August 2024) at £99.40 per day. | Upheld | — | £1,093 |
| Breach of contract | Gross notice pay awarded: 12 weeks' statutory notice at £497 per week. | Upheld | — | £5,964 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment calculated as 20 years x 1.5 x £497 per week. | Upheld | — | £14,910 |
| Unfair dismissal | The remedy judgment records that liability was determined on 14 March 2025 under rule 22 (respondent did not attend). The listing categorised the case as including unfair dismissal; no separate compensatory or basic award figure is set out in this remedy judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £23,347
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.