Case 1810866/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A v The University of Huddersfield — 2020
- Case reference
- 1810866/2018
- Decision date
- 26 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr R Webb, Mr M Taj
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the respondent unfairly dismissed the claimant, Mr A. It ordered payment of a Basic Award of £4,064 and a Compensatory Award of £35,246 in consequence of that unfair dismissal.
The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay £780, described as arising from its unreasonable conduct of the proceedings. The judgment states that the recoupment regulations do not apply to the awards.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal claim and awarded a Basic Award of £4,064 and a Compensatory Award of £35,246. It also ordered a separate payment of £780 for unreasonable conduct of the proceedings. | Upheld | — | £39,310 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £40,090
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,064
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £35,246
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.