Case 1811429/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Bashir v Aflex Hose Limited At a hearing by CVP, after hearing the solicitor for the claimant and counsel for the respondent. — 2025
- Case reference
- 1811429/2024
- Decision date
- 10 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wilkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Bashir
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52, issued by Employment Judge Wilkinson Date after a CVP hearing. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims of indirect discrimination on the grounds of race and religion, harassment relating to race and religion, victimisation relating to race and religion, and whistle-blowing / public interest disclosure were dismissed in their entirety following a withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment also stated that the balance of the claimant's direct race and religious discrimination claim, which had been dealt with in the judgment dated 23 June 2025, and his constructive unfair dismissal claim were unaffected by this order. No remedy was determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Indirect discrimination on the grounds of race; dismissed in its entirety following the claimant's withdrawal. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Indirect discrimination on the grounds of religion; dismissed in its entirety following the claimant's withdrawal. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Harassment | Harassment relating to race and religion; dismissed in its entirety following the claimant's withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation relating to race and religion; dismissed in its entirety following the claimant's withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Whistle-blowing / public interest disclosure claim; dismissed in its entirety following the claimant's withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.