Case 2200004/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Verma v London Underground Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2200004/2023
- Decision date
- 3 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Ms J Marshall, Mr P Secher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Verma
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting at London Central before Employment Judge A M Snelson with members Ms J Marshall and Mr P Secher, heard the case over 1-3 November 2023. Both parties were represented by counsel.
The unanimous judgment was that the Claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and direct race and age discrimination were not well-founded. The proceedings were dismissed, and no remedy was awarded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and the proceedings were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states the complaint of direct race discrimination was not well-founded and the proceedings were dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment states the complaint of direct age discrimination was not well-founded and the proceedings were dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.