Case 2200172/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Alvis-Henry v Bionic Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2200172/2024
- Decision date
- 27 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Alvis-Henry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Anderson sat alone at London Central and heard the case on 18, 19 and 20 March 2025. The claimant, Mr J Alvis-Henry, appeared in person and the respondent, Bionic Services Limited, was represented by Ms Cashell, Counsel.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination claim was found not well founded. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Age discrimination | Direct age discrimination claim was found not well founded. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination claim was found not well founded. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Harassment claim related to race was found not well founded. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Harassment claim related to age was found not well founded. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Harassment | Harassment claim related to sex was found not well founded. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.