Case 2200507/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Carlos Fabian Real Velasco v Crystal Services plc — 2023
- Case reference
- 2200507/2021
- Decision date
- 5 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge BENNETT Representation
- Venue
- London Central via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Carlos Fabian Real Velasco
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim of Carlos Fabian Real Velasco against Crystal Services Plc was heard at London Central via CVP on 4 and 5 May 2023 before Employment Judge Bennett. The written judgment records that the claimant’s complaint of breach of contract was well-founded and that he was unfairly dismissed. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a total of £7,822.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the breach of contract complaint well-founded and awarded outstanding notice pay of £116. | Upheld | — | £116 |
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant was found to have been unfairly dismissed. The award for this claim comprised £870 as the basic award/statutory redundancy payment and £6,836 as the compensatory award. | Upheld | — | £7,706 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,822
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £870
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £6,836
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.