Case 2200550/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Becave Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2200550/2022
- Decision date
- 19 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sullivan Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr K Yamoah, was employed by Becave Ltd as a Junior Backend Developer from 27 April 2021 until 24 December 2021. He claimed unpaid wages of £1,909.60 for the period 23 November 2021 to 23 December 2021.
The respondent did not present a response and did not attend the hearing. An email sent to the tribunal on 13 April 2022 asked to pay and close the matter, but the tribunal directed the respondent to communicate directly with the claimant if it wished to settle. The claimant confirmed that he had not received any communication from the respondent and that his own attempts to communicate after termination had been unsuccessful.
The tribunal heard evidence on oath from the claimant, accepted the contents of his claim, and found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction of £1,909.60 from his wages. The judgment orders payment of that amount as a gross figure, subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages in the amount of £1,909.60 gross, covering 23 November 2021 to 23 December 2021. | Upheld | — | £1,910 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,910
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.