Case 2200612/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Buthelezi v Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 2200612/2022
- Decision date
- 29 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Buthelezi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Snelson sitting alone on 6 May 2022, Mr P Buthelezi's original race discrimination complaint was struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. The tribunal also refused his earlier application to amend the claim form to add breach of contract.
The tribunal granted the later amendment dated 29 April 2022 to add unfair (constructive) dismissal, and it recorded that the proceedings would continue only on that basis. It refused the respondents' applications to strike out the unfair dismissal claim or to make it subject to a deposit order. The tribunal identified the later liability questions as whether there had been a repudiatory breach of the contract of employment, whether any repudiation had been accepted by resignation without affirming the contract, and whether the resulting constructive dismissal was fair under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal recorded that the alleged breach of the implied term of mutual confidence was said to arise from treatment over time, including matters relating to job evaluation and alleged broken promises, grievances, and Covid-19 rules and measures. Mr Buthelezi also reserved the right to refer in evidence to past disciplinary action, although not as part of the alleged breach. No merits finding or monetary award was made at this hearing, and directions were given for further particulars, loss, disclosure, witness statements, and a final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The complaint in the original claim form was struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The amendment to add unfair (constructive) dismissal was granted, so the claim proceeded to a final hearing. No liability or remedy determination was made at this preliminary hearing. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- no reasonable prospect of success
- deposit order threshold
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.