Case 2200774/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Olusamokun v London Underground Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2200774/2024
- Decision date
- 29 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Olusamokun
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim for unfair dismissal against London Underground Limited. The Tribunal considered whether the claim had been presented within the applicable time limit under section 111(1) Employment Rights Act 1996.
The Tribunal found that the claim was presented out of time. Although it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present it within time, the Tribunal found that it was not submitted within a reasonable period after the time limit had expired under section 111(2)(b). The Tribunal therefore held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim and struck it out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was struck out because the Tribunal found it did not have jurisdiction: it was presented out of time and not submitted within a reasonable period after expiry of the time limit. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 111(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 111(2)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.