Case 2201151/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Platt-Mills, of Counsel For v Mr J Gerber, Solicitor — 2018
- Case reference
- 2201151/2019
- Decision date
- 6 April 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Walker Members
- Panel members
- Mrs D Olulode, Ms E Ali
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Platt-Mills, of Counsel For
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that on 3 November 2018 Mr Agha touched or slapped the claimant's backside while she was in the restaurant kitchen area playing wedding music. It accepted that the incident happened and that it had the effect of violating her dignity, so the sexual harassment claim under s.26(2) Equality Act 2010 succeeded. It rejected the separate s.26(3) theory because the claimant's later complaint was not a 'rejection' of the conduct within the meaning of that provision.
On the surrounding factual disputes, the tribunal found the claimant's explanation about tips implausible, but it could not conclude on the evidence that she had stolen till money because the respondents produced no proper audit or investigation. It accepted that on 5 November 2018 she met Mr Torfinejad and demanded that Mr Agha be dismissed immediately or she would leave, and it rejected the assertion that she was summarily dismissed. The tribunal found she resigned.
The tribunal upheld victimisation because it accepted that Mr Torfinejad threatened to blacklist the claimant if she brought a claim, that wages and holiday pay were delayed, and that the response to the data subject access request was incomplete because CCTV clips were not disclosed and no explanation was given. It recorded a threat to contact the police in the solicitor's letter, but excluded that from the injury-to-feelings assessment. It also held that the first respondent failed to provide a written statement of particulars of employment and made a separate award of £476.06 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002.
The tribunal assessed injury to feelings at £8,600, placing the case at the border between Vento bands 1 and 2. It declined aggravated damages and any ACAS uplift. The wrongful dismissal and breach of contract claims failed, and the separate sex discrimination dismissal claim had already been withdrawn. The total award was £9,076.06.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | s.26(2) EqA 2010 sexual harassment: the tribunal found Mr Agha slapped/touched the claimant's backside on 3 November 2018, accepted the conduct occurred and held it had the effect of violating her dignity. The injury-to-feelings award was global with victimisation and was not split per claim. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Harassment | s.26(3) EqA 2010 rejection-based harassment: the tribunal held the claimant's later complaint was not a 'rejection' within the meaning of the section, because the incident was a one-off and had already happened before any rejection could occur. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | The tribunal found protected acts in the claimant indicating she might bring proceedings and later alleging Equality Act contraventions. It upheld detriments including the blacklist threat, delayed wages/holiday pay, and the incomplete response to the data subject access request. The £8,600 injury-to-feelings award was global with harassment and not split per claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal recorded that this sex discrimination dismissal claim had already been withdrawn and therefore did not address it. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant resigned with immediate effect and was not dismissed, so the wrongful dismissal claim failed. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,076
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.26 Equality Act 2010
- s.27 Equality Act 2010
- s.109 Equality Act 2010
- s.136 Equality Act 2010
- Vento bands
- s.1-4 ERA 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
- s.207A TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.