Case 2201185/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Oliveira v Santander UK plc London Central: 3 November 2020 — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201185/2020
- Decision date
- 3 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicolle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Oliveira
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Nicolle, sitting with members, heard Ms R Oliveira's claims against Santander UK Plc. The tribunal recorded that the claims were for direct race discrimination contrary to sections 13 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010 and unlawful harassment on account of race contrary to sections 26 and 40 of the Equality Act 2010.
Both claims failed and were dismissed. The written extract states that the reasons for dismissal were given orally to the parties on 3 November 2020, but it does not reproduce those reasons or identify any remedy awarded. The extract therefore records the outcomes only, with no further findings available in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Claim of direct race discrimination under sections 13 and 39 Equality Act 2010; dismissed. The extract states that reasons were given orally on 3 November 2020, but does not set them out. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Claim of unlawful harassment on account of race under sections 26 and 40 Equality Act 2010; dismissed. The extract states that reasons were given orally on 3 November 2020, but does not set them out. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.