Case 2201201/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Sumessur v London Underground Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2201201/2023
- Decision date
- 8 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Sumessur
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard the claimant in person, assisted by a McKenzie friend, and the respondent represented by counsel. It determined that the claimant's complaint of race discrimination had been presented out of time and that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider it.
The Tribunal further determined that the remainder of the claimant's claims were struck out because, on time grounds, they had no reasonable prospect of success. It stated that the proceedings as a whole were therefore at an end.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the race discrimination complaint was presented out of time and that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider it. | Other | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment refers only to 'the remainder of the Claimant's claims' being struck out on time grounds. This claim type is taken from the listing category rather than being individually named in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers only to 'the remainder of the Claimant's claims' being struck out on time grounds. This claim type is taken from the listing category rather than being individually named in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment refers only to 'the remainder of the Claimant's claims' being struck out on time grounds. This claim type is taken from the listing category rather than being individually named in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers only to 'the remainder of the Claimant's claims' being struck out on time grounds. This claim type is taken from the listing category rather than being individually named in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.